The internets have been having fun with a recent opinion post from Byron York.
Of particular ridicule is this portion:
... and his sky-high ratings among African-Americans make some of his positions appear a bit more popular overall than they actually are.
I would like to say that in the article he goes into some analysis of the numbers an explains his statement. I can't do that though, he doesn't analyze anything, he just spits out statistics with no real statistical argument.
Either way I can read the original statement and not think it is racist.
Many black's in America (do I really have to say African-Americans) rate Obama highly. One can't really assert that this is the same as agreeing with his positions, e.g. loving the man is not the same as loving his positions.
However the fool (York) never really makes this connection and presents statistics about how blacks and whites rate Obama's performance differently.
To defend himself against the charges of racism from the "usual suspects on the left" he cites that statistics can be misleading and the poll statistics are interesting and his critics should take time to analyze them - something he didn't bother to do.
From his article, I don't think he is a racist, I just think he is a bit stupid.
|
Page Summary
April 2009
|
I should copyright my DNA. Beat my old time by a few seconds, but the old time was with no incline, the new time is at 1% My Kindle is in Kentucky - should be her by end of week! 4 Miles: 29m 52s Gerald "Jerry" Scott Lovely evening for a walk in the snow. I just wish that I had had a choice. Last night I ran two miles in 12 minutes and 54 seconds. Marty Kaplan had this to say about Ralph Nader My original plan of going to one of the bars with big election day events planned, didn't pan out. The lines were huge! I settled for a small bar with two TVs tuned to CNN and Wireless internet access. |
